Check this out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2R7HwwMoJE regarding Teslaphoresis and look at the science of graphene oxide as antennas. Graphene oxide is one atom thick. Nanobots? I'm still looking, but wonder is there's a link between harm from graphene oxide when also exposed to radio waves. What about the frequencies? Dr. Royal Rife did a number of studies on radio frequencies and their impact on living cells; Tesla said "If you want to find the secrets of the Universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration." The Hutchison effect is studied by PhD's in university level courses with respect to quantum physics. I'm convinced that the jabs intentionally harm, maim and kill. I'm not sure if they contain graphene oxide. If they do, it's for the same harm, maim, kill purpose so it's important to figure out how to 1.) remove graphene oxide from the body and 2.) protect against the reason it's there. Graphene oxide can enter the body in many different ways and is small enough to cross the blood-brain barrier. Clotting agent? Heated by radio frequencies? Cancer stimuli? Only one part of a multi-part recipe and the remaining ingredients are yet to be added? Humanity must be protected from the evil (explicative here) that are trying to 'save Mother Earth' by destroying the images of God.
Thanks for the link. Graphene oxide does make a good high (RF) frequency conductor; that much I have read in the literature. And it is finding use in medical applications. It's purpose if it is in the vaccine is unknown. I sincerely doubt Pfizer was running experiments on graphene oxide antennas in vivo while working on their mRNA based jabs. :-). Agree upon much of your assessment, but its speculative. -Just south of you 70 miles or so, DenverDad.
As can be seen in the figure, this model could be conformed " to a micrometric or nanometric
scale” using several layers of graphene, which would perform the functions of sensor, actuator,
router and communication antenna. A physical characterization is also described that matches
with the EM electromagnetic wavelength ranges that have been mentioned, specifically 6GHz and
the compatibility with the use of antennas operating in the Terahertz band (0.1-10 THz) In this
same work, that of (Abadal, S.; Liaskos, C.; Tsioliaridou, A.; Ioannidis, S.; Pitsillides, A.; SoléPareta, J.; Cabellos-Aparicio, A. 2017), it is indicated that one of the simplest methods for
modulation and control of these software-defined graphene metamaterials (SDM) is the coding of
delay time activation and deactivation TS-OOK, which represents logic pulses for binary
encoding of 0 and 1. For example, "a logical 0 (1) is represented by silence (short pulse),
respectively, with a relatively long time between transmissions. This simplifies the receiver and
reduces the probability of collisions. Furthermore, this approach can be opportunistically
combined with low-weight coding and rate division multiple access to maximize its efficiency ."
Therefore, the" TS-OOK", "is the appropriate activation method with which the request-response /
client-server mechanisms are enabled in this type of network. On the other hand, analyzing the
Well to a degree of TS-OOK signaling with femtosecond pulses and BOOLEAN logic gates for DNA computation - I also learned about the spintronics in quantum cellular automata and how the plasmonic nanorectennas run on 0.1 nW and 21 mV for each element, supplied by EMF through the monoatomic layer of graphene oxide etc.... Mik Andersen wrote extensively about this : https://xochipelli.substack.com/p/more-essays-from-mik-andersen
So I’ll put you to a simple test. What is the wavelength of a 2.4 Ghz signal in free space, and how does wavelength relate to antenna size? At what frequency is it practical to start integrating antennas on integrated circuits? What efficiency issues need to be dealt with. How does a human body affect transmission at those frequencies? What are s parameters? How are they used? How are they measured? Why are they important? This is basic EE 101 stuff.
"Another fundamental challenge for wireless nanocommunication networks is the access barriers to the human body, that is, the skin. This is due to the characteristics of the dermis, made up of
various layers that diffuse the signal, causing it to lose the path of the channel in
nanoelectromagnetic communication. With this approach, the work of ( Chopra, N .; Phipott, M .;
Alomainy, A .; Abbasi, QH; Qaraqe, K .; Shubair, RM 2016) studies which is the appropriate THz
band to penetrate the skin without the signal is lost, until reaching the gateway nano-interface
inside the body (graphene / nano-antenna nanodevice, explained later). It is recognized that
nanocommunication protocols and models are clear, stating that " using the EM paradigm;
transmission capacity can reach up to Tera-bits per second (Tb / s) at the millimeter level. The
IEEE 1906.1 protocol is dedicated to maintaining and defining communication standards at the
nanoscale, where molecular and electromagnetic communication are the two modes of
communication . "However, the properties of communication from the outside of the body to the
inside pose problems for the distortion that it produces in the signals, which forces to determine
the appropriate band and frequency, referring that " the existing data on human skin are restricted
to magnitudes of GHz, while only a few have been published relative to the order of THz. To
enrich the database with the parameters of biological tissues in the THz band, emphasis is placed on spectroscopy and modeling of biological tissues. Time Domain Spectroscopy (TDS) THz has a typical range of 0.1 ─ 4 THz, providing the opportunity for broader spectral analysis . "In conclusion, the authors are able to model the appropriate propagation band and scheme. to
minimize noise and discover the cause of communication penetration problems, pointing out that
"the absorption of water (hydration of the skin), the propagation distance and the frequency range affect the loss of trajectory that ends up blurring the signal and with it the message ... Therefore, to pass through human skin, it needs to link communication between antennas and nanodevices present in people's bodies . "These details fit perfectly with the "
Nano interface (Gateway-Gateway) . It is defined as " a hybrid device in charge of capturing the signals emitted from the outside and transmitting them inside. It uses the communication of TB (Terahertz Band) to communicate with the nano side (inside the human body or the plant) and the paradigm classic communication with the outside world ".
Great buzzwords but you aren’t saying anything. Much like Sabrina Wallace. I’m guessing you are Sabrina Wallace. Same gobbledegook techno -speak to impress the techno ignorant but without imparting actual information to communicate with the techno-proficient like myself. Same style as exhibited in her godless newagie videos. ‘All I need to know? Those papers and your response to my question provide me with nothing I need to know. So graphene oxide conducts. So what? It’s one of many types of materials which do. Our bodies conduct electricity as well. It doesn’t mean that our bodies, created and designed by God are hackable using IEEE communication standards set up for communication between electronic devices designed by man... standards set up without conferring to God, btw, so that Vendor A of electronic device A can talk to Vendor B of electronic device B. These can be and are most certainly wearables like holter monitors.. I worked on Mojo visions AR contact lens, a project now cancelled. You can YouTube it.... but that is an example of the real world product that does real world communication which require standards..... standards agreed upon by committees of engineers who will be designing products using those standards. I know for a fact they didn’t consult God for the human interface boot-loaderto hack humans as Sabrina Wallace insinuates.
Ever hear of Moore's law? Why did "industry" persue it? A single fab costs in excesss of 1 Billion dollars. Why do they do it? Because they invest in opportunities that will return dividends on their investment. Not because they want to monitor your little self-important brain and kill you off.
Making things smaller means they go "faster", and consume less power. When I entered my professional life, CMOS was at the level of "sub-micron"....the buzz word then. Since I entered, we are pushing 5 nano-meters on transistor gate lengths, which is about 1/100th of when I enterd my professional life. Why did they do it? So they can make cheaper, faster higher performance CPUs, enable things like cell phones, 3G, 4G, 5G and beyond. Going to higher frequencies open up more business opportunities like streaming/downloading movies, storing more and more data in your cell phone. My son has a 1Terabyte Iphone. A Terbabyte!?!. When I enterd my professional life, the state of the art hard drives were 40Gbytes. Now hw holds a Terabyte in his hands. And now fiber is being delivered to the curb in just about every neighborhood which allows far more data to be downloaded.
Don't worry, at no time soon will you have to worry about your conscience being uploaded. "Lucy", another sci fi movie. Johnny mneumonic..another scifi pushing similar schemes....all horseshit.
Check this out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2R7HwwMoJE regarding Teslaphoresis and look at the science of graphene oxide as antennas. Graphene oxide is one atom thick. Nanobots? I'm still looking, but wonder is there's a link between harm from graphene oxide when also exposed to radio waves. What about the frequencies? Dr. Royal Rife did a number of studies on radio frequencies and their impact on living cells; Tesla said "If you want to find the secrets of the Universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration." The Hutchison effect is studied by PhD's in university level courses with respect to quantum physics. I'm convinced that the jabs intentionally harm, maim and kill. I'm not sure if they contain graphene oxide. If they do, it's for the same harm, maim, kill purpose so it's important to figure out how to 1.) remove graphene oxide from the body and 2.) protect against the reason it's there. Graphene oxide can enter the body in many different ways and is small enough to cross the blood-brain barrier. Clotting agent? Heated by radio frequencies? Cancer stimuli? Only one part of a multi-part recipe and the remaining ingredients are yet to be added? Humanity must be protected from the evil (explicative here) that are trying to 'save Mother Earth' by destroying the images of God.
Thanks for the link. Graphene oxide does make a good high (RF) frequency conductor; that much I have read in the literature. And it is finding use in medical applications. It's purpose if it is in the vaccine is unknown. I sincerely doubt Pfizer was running experiments on graphene oxide antennas in vivo while working on their mRNA based jabs. :-). Agree upon much of your assessment, but its speculative. -Just south of you 70 miles or so, DenverDad.
here is all you need to know. Acknowledge this now, start understanding that it is real and I hope that you do not have other motivations denying the obvious : https://xochipelli.substack.com/p/mik-andersens-39-articles-in-english
Do you actually understand any of it?
As can be seen in the figure, this model could be conformed " to a micrometric or nanometric
scale” using several layers of graphene, which would perform the functions of sensor, actuator,
router and communication antenna. A physical characterization is also described that matches
with the EM electromagnetic wavelength ranges that have been mentioned, specifically 6GHz and
the compatibility with the use of antennas operating in the Terahertz band (0.1-10 THz) In this
same work, that of (Abadal, S.; Liaskos, C.; Tsioliaridou, A.; Ioannidis, S.; Pitsillides, A.; SoléPareta, J.; Cabellos-Aparicio, A. 2017), it is indicated that one of the simplest methods for
modulation and control of these software-defined graphene metamaterials (SDM) is the coding of
delay time activation and deactivation TS-OOK, which represents logic pulses for binary
encoding of 0 and 1. For example, "a logical 0 (1) is represented by silence (short pulse),
respectively, with a relatively long time between transmissions. This simplifies the receiver and
reduces the probability of collisions. Furthermore, this approach can be opportunistically
combined with low-weight coding and rate division multiple access to maximize its efficiency ."
Therefore, the" TS-OOK", "is the appropriate activation method with which the request-response /
client-server mechanisms are enabled in this type of network. On the other hand, analyzing the
article by (Abadal, S.; Liaskos, C.; Tsioliaridou, A.; Ioannidis, S.; Pitsillides, A.; Solé-Pareta, J.;
Cabellos-Aparicio, A. 2017) is the answer to one of the strangest phenomena that have been
observed in people inoculated with the vaccine of the c0r0n @ v | rus. It is the phenomenon of the
MAC address that is observed when searching for devices connected by bluetooth. This is because
the authors implicitly recognize the inherent existence of the media access control protocol, also
known as MAC, expressed in the following words " Energy harvesting is another pillar of the
nanoregrid, as it can enable the concept of perpetual networks. Its impact on the design of the
protocol stack of nano-grids has been the subject of intense research in recent years, covering
aspects such as power consumption policy or the media access control (MAC) protocol and
evaluating performance. network potential. perpetual networks. The metamaterials community
could benefit from these contributions, as an important milestone is making SDMs reconfigurable
without compromising their autonomy.” This confirms without a doubt that the phenomenon of
the MAC address localized through bluetooth is perfectly feasible. This is fully corroborated when
the research of (Mohrehkesh, S.; Weigle, MC; Das, SK 2015) with its DRIH-MAC model which
is a media access control protocol " initiated by the receiver for communication between nanodes
in a wireless electromagnetic nanoregrid "that fully matches the electromagnetic environment of
graphene and is based on " the following principles: a) communication begins through the
receiver with the aim of maximizing energy use; b) the distributed scheme to access the medium is
designed based on the coloring of the graph (distributed and predictive technique); c)
communications programming work in coordination with the energy harvesting process ". For
more information, the authors indicate in their conclusions that the DRIH-MAC protocol was
evaluated in comparison with the MAC" in the context of a medical monitoring application. The
simulation results showed that DRIH-MAC used energy better ... In the future, we will investigate
the use of DRIH-MAC in other applications such as Internet of Nano-Things or a network of
nano-robots. Both the traffic model and the application requirements are different in these
nanoregrid applications. A possible solution could be a hybrid design of centralized and
distributed topologies to address the needs of such networks . "These findings fully confirm the
application of MAC, its use in software-defined graphene nanomaterials (SDM), and the existence
of the packet and data protocol as shown in Figures 9 and 10.
https://xochipelli.substack.com/p/mik-andersens-39-articles-in-english
Well to a degree of TS-OOK signaling with femtosecond pulses and BOOLEAN logic gates for DNA computation - I also learned about the spintronics in quantum cellular automata and how the plasmonic nanorectennas run on 0.1 nW and 21 mV for each element, supplied by EMF through the monoatomic layer of graphene oxide etc.... Mik Andersen wrote extensively about this : https://xochipelli.substack.com/p/more-essays-from-mik-andersen
So I’ll put you to a simple test. What is the wavelength of a 2.4 Ghz signal in free space, and how does wavelength relate to antenna size? At what frequency is it practical to start integrating antennas on integrated circuits? What efficiency issues need to be dealt with. How does a human body affect transmission at those frequencies? What are s parameters? How are they used? How are they measured? Why are they important? This is basic EE 101 stuff.
"Another fundamental challenge for wireless nanocommunication networks is the access barriers to the human body, that is, the skin. This is due to the characteristics of the dermis, made up of
various layers that diffuse the signal, causing it to lose the path of the channel in
nanoelectromagnetic communication. With this approach, the work of ( Chopra, N .; Phipott, M .;
Alomainy, A .; Abbasi, QH; Qaraqe, K .; Shubair, RM 2016) studies which is the appropriate THz
band to penetrate the skin without the signal is lost, until reaching the gateway nano-interface
inside the body (graphene / nano-antenna nanodevice, explained later). It is recognized that
nanocommunication protocols and models are clear, stating that " using the EM paradigm;
transmission capacity can reach up to Tera-bits per second (Tb / s) at the millimeter level. The
IEEE 1906.1 protocol is dedicated to maintaining and defining communication standards at the
nanoscale, where molecular and electromagnetic communication are the two modes of
communication . "However, the properties of communication from the outside of the body to the
inside pose problems for the distortion that it produces in the signals, which forces to determine
the appropriate band and frequency, referring that " the existing data on human skin are restricted
to magnitudes of GHz, while only a few have been published relative to the order of THz. To
enrich the database with the parameters of biological tissues in the THz band, emphasis is placed on spectroscopy and modeling of biological tissues. Time Domain Spectroscopy (TDS) THz has a typical range of 0.1 ─ 4 THz, providing the opportunity for broader spectral analysis . "In conclusion, the authors are able to model the appropriate propagation band and scheme. to
minimize noise and discover the cause of communication penetration problems, pointing out that
"the absorption of water (hydration of the skin), the propagation distance and the frequency range affect the loss of trajectory that ends up blurring the signal and with it the message ... Therefore, to pass through human skin, it needs to link communication between antennas and nanodevices present in people's bodies . "These details fit perfectly with the "
well the computational parts can be defined in the DNA of DsDNA Crystals that are almost two dimensional : https://xochipelli.substack.com/p/self-assembly-of-dna-crystals-mik
counter - question : How do you explain the MAC Address phenomenon ?
you are welcome my friend !
"The study analyzes how to operate the spintronics of graphene using Cobalt-Nickel
ferromagnetic electrodes, which achieve spin spin efficiencies in a range of 60-80%, which
means a good capacity for computational interaction. In other words, it is possible to transfer
the principles of binary and quantum computing, as in a processor or PC chip on a
motherboard, to graphene, on a nanometric scale." https://xochipelli.fr/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/corona2inspect-entrada30EN-espintronica-grafeno.pdf
well these plasmonic nanorectennas function differently than your CPU driven system haha
Well the transfer to the EEG airpods is limited to 10 THZ within 10 cm of distance and 1 THZ for one meter distance https://xochipelli.fr/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/corona2inspect_entrada13EN_oxido_grafeno_estimulacion_cerebral_ondas.pdf
Nano interface (Gateway-Gateway) . It is defined as " a hybrid device in charge of capturing the signals emitted from the outside and transmitting them inside. It uses the communication of TB (Terahertz Band) to communicate with the nano side (inside the human body or the plant) and the paradigm classic communication with the outside world ".
https://xochipelli.fr/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/corona2inspect_entrada37EN_redes_nanocomunicacion_inalambrica_nanotecnologia.pdf
https://xochipelli.fr/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/corona2inspect_entrada39EN_sistema_enrutamiento_corona_nanorredes.pdf
Great buzzwords but you aren’t saying anything. Much like Sabrina Wallace. I’m guessing you are Sabrina Wallace. Same gobbledegook techno -speak to impress the techno ignorant but without imparting actual information to communicate with the techno-proficient like myself. Same style as exhibited in her godless newagie videos. ‘All I need to know? Those papers and your response to my question provide me with nothing I need to know. So graphene oxide conducts. So what? It’s one of many types of materials which do. Our bodies conduct electricity as well. It doesn’t mean that our bodies, created and designed by God are hackable using IEEE communication standards set up for communication between electronic devices designed by man... standards set up without conferring to God, btw, so that Vendor A of electronic device A can talk to Vendor B of electronic device B. These can be and are most certainly wearables like holter monitors.. I worked on Mojo visions AR contact lens, a project now cancelled. You can YouTube it.... but that is an example of the real world product that does real world communication which require standards..... standards agreed upon by committees of engineers who will be designing products using those standards. I know for a fact they didn’t consult God for the human interface boot-loaderto hack humans as Sabrina Wallace insinuates.
I hope you are right !
Ever hear of Moore's law? Why did "industry" persue it? A single fab costs in excesss of 1 Billion dollars. Why do they do it? Because they invest in opportunities that will return dividends on their investment. Not because they want to monitor your little self-important brain and kill you off.
Making things smaller means they go "faster", and consume less power. When I entered my professional life, CMOS was at the level of "sub-micron"....the buzz word then. Since I entered, we are pushing 5 nano-meters on transistor gate lengths, which is about 1/100th of when I enterd my professional life. Why did they do it? So they can make cheaper, faster higher performance CPUs, enable things like cell phones, 3G, 4G, 5G and beyond. Going to higher frequencies open up more business opportunities like streaming/downloading movies, storing more and more data in your cell phone. My son has a 1Terabyte Iphone. A Terbabyte!?!. When I enterd my professional life, the state of the art hard drives were 40Gbytes. Now hw holds a Terabyte in his hands. And now fiber is being delivered to the curb in just about every neighborhood which allows far more data to be downloaded.
Don't worry, at no time soon will you have to worry about your conscience being uploaded. "Lucy", another sci fi movie. Johnny mneumonic..another scifi pushing similar schemes....all horseshit.